http://www.infoshop.org/inews/stories.php?story=02/04/04/3211548
Extract.
"...Many activists began to think then that, after the blip of 11 
September, world events were still moving their way. Some among them saw 
the need to push the movement beyond the now familiar scenes of protests 
and riots. They decided, in fact, to bankrupt the World Bank.
It might sound far-fetched. The bank, after all, is a huge global 
operation. It is owed $2.5trn by developing countries and employs 10,000 
people worldwide. In 1997, it extracted $1bn more from Africa than it lent 
to the continent.
But who owns the World Bank? We do. Ordinary people in the west - through 
their trade unions, churches, town councils, universities and private 
investments - own the bank, but they don't know that. The bank raises 
nearly all its funds by issuing bonds on the private market. These are 
often held by socially minded institutions that would be horrified to think 
they were propping up an ultra-neoliberal organisation.
So activists have come up with a simple way of breaking the bank: boycott 
their bonds and bankrupt them.
Dennis Brutus, a patron of Jubilee 2000 South Africa and a founder member 
of the new campaign, has been told many times before that boycotts achieve 
nothing. He heard people say it when he was a prisoner on Robben Island and 
was pleading for the world to boycott South African goods. He is unashamed 
in drawing a direct parallel: "We need to break the power of the World Bank 
over developing countries," he explains, "as the disinvestment movement 
helped break the power of the apartheid regime in South Africa." 

Reply via email to