> Oh, and I can't believe I almost forgot--I'm sure you'll be
> tickled pink to learn that ever having had anything to do with
> you can be the kiss of death as far as getting clearance is
> concerned. From the adjudication guidelines:
>
> http://www.dss.mil/training/adr/adjguid/adjguidF.htm
>
> "Conditions that could raise a security concern and may be
> disqualifying include:
>
>>d. Any foreign, domestic, or international organization or person
engaged in
analysis, discussion, or publication of material on intelligence,
defense,
foreign affairs, or protected technology.<<
However Faustine neglects to include the simple solution, that you
simply
renounce playing with Johnny:
>>Conditions that could mitigate security concerns include:
b. The individual terminates the employment or discontinues the
activity upon
being notified that it is in conflict with his or her security
responsibilities.<<
More interestingly, s/he neglects to include this disqualifier from
State Secrets:
>>Allegiance to the United States
Conditions that could raise a security concern and may be disqualifying
include:
d. Involvement in activities which unlawfully advocate or practice
the
commission of acts of force or violence to prevent others from
exercising
their rights under the Constitution or laws of the United States or
of any state.<<
How many Congressvermin, police w/ NCIS access, FBI, judges, domestic
spooks of all flavors, etc are guilty of this?
