>>"Witnessing hi-tech firms dive into China is like watching the Gadarene swine."<<
reading peter? I hope Peter Treis employers know how concerned about our human rights he is.I must package up some of his contributions here and mail em off to bidzos. >>"cDc does not consider > Web defacements or Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to be legitimate > hacktivist actions. The former is nothing more than hi-tech vandalism, and > the latter, an assault on free speech."<< DoS shut down WEF in NYC and some web 'defacements' are more like improvements and may even aspire to art. Does cDc have some alternative? Besides the stale old backdoor BO.What have you done for us lately o your bovine highnesses? >>"There is no such thing as electronic civil disobedience."<< The hell there aint.WTF was the WEF DoS? It wasnt the 1st either,there was one during Quebec. >>"hacktivists are waging > peace, not war. "<< You lose. >>"Hacktivists could become > something akin to a United Nations peacekeeping force."<< More insulting naivete.Whats next...the hacktavist peacecorp? >>"But it does raise the > question: why are we put in the position of doing this work? With billions of > dollars in government budgets at their disposal, when are the world's liberal > democracies going to put some of their resources into opening up the > Internet? We know they don't care about human rights policy when it conflicts > with jobs at home; but what about international security? As Beijing > continues to play the patriotism card domestically, a more open Internet > could diffuse traditional xenophobia through greater one-on-one interaction > on-line. > > But until Western governments become engaged, ..."<< Insults our intelligence,the cia have invested in a China cracking crypto Company.The CdC seem years behind the times and appear to want to lead from the rear,and with what?empty hands flapping in the breeze.This is sad.cDc couda beena contender.The daily bleed has more revolutionary info in its little finger than Oxblood in his whole carcass.
