'C' stands for Crawford,Shrubs school grades and Castor seed poison needed 
to take out the Cunt.
If the White House is empty, it must be August.
With presidents like this, who needs enemies?
Download attached file: prettyvacant. (mimetype: image/pjpeg )The World 
This Week: Pretty Vacant
If the White House is empty, it must be August.
http://www.newmassmedia.com/nac.phtml?code=har&db=nac_fea&ref=21531
By Alan Bisbort
Published 08/08/02

After bringing America to the brink of economic collapse and hammering out 
the framework of his permanent police state, George W. Bush is taking 
August off for vacation. The rest of us who have to work for a living can 
expect absurd photo ops to abound (e.g., Bush is the only person in Texas 
who chops wood in the middle of August). While Bush putters about on his 
ranch in his golf cart, dressed in silly cowboy duds, the nation should 
take a collective sigh of relief. With presidents like this, who needs 
enemies?

While there's a break in the inaction, let's flash back to last August. 
That is the month W. chose to be -- paraphrasing his Poppy -- out of the 
loop. Too bad for us, because that's the month when intelligence reports 
were coming in as fast and furious as Scud missiles about al Qaeda's plans 
to hijack planes and use them as missiles. Indeed, Osama all but Fed-Ex'ed 
a hand-delivered, gilt-edged notice to Bush's ranch about his plans. And 
yet, Condi Rice "assured" us that they could not "connect the dots."

Even if hindsight is 20/20, it's as clear as a summer day last August in 
Crawford, Texas that George W. Bush was driving completely blind in the 
month before the terror attacks. Bush insists that he took all necessary 
measures to prevent an attack from occurring, but I went back and examined 
every issue of Time and Newsweek from Aug. 6 through Sept. 10, 2001 -- and 
I would warrant that the same pattern would be seen were one to pore over 
daily editions of, say, the New York Times and the Washington Post.

I examined these magazines, in part, out of native curiosity. I did it 
also, in part, because I was given this challenge by one of my readers:

"To my knowledge, no one has yet asked or answered the question: 'What were 
Bush and Cheney doing during that month that they regarded as more 
important than dealing with and passing along a terrorist threat that wound 
up costing more than 3,000 lives in the first attack upon the soil of our 
sovereign nation? Were they gerrymandering environmental laws to help their 
cronies make money? Were they meeting with Enron execs so that these soiled 
crooks could set energy policy? What were these two fellows, still so 
highly regarded by the American public for their strength of character, 
doing during that crucial month while the al-Qaeda suicide hijackers were 
making their final plans?"

It seems the press did not connect the dots, either. During the five weeks 
prior to Sept. 11, America's two widest-circulating news magazines did not 
carry a single story on domestic terrorism, bioterrorism, vigilance at 
America's airports or even the slightest hint that anyone on Bush's staff, 
from Colin Powell to John Ashcroft to Rove, Card, Rice and Cheney gave even 
a nod, wave or shoulder-shrug to the possibility of a domestic terrorist 
attack.

They may insist that all of their "preparedness" was being done behind the 
scenes (don't want to tip the old hand to wily evildoers like Osama and 
Saddam, now, do we?), but a complete lack of forewarning has been remarked 
upon by the pilots' association, air traffic controllers, business 
travelers, and even Rudi Giuliani (who, instead of trying to prop up Bush, 
should stand alongside the people of his wounded city, rightfully demanding 
answers). My point: Even if they were working behind the scenes, they did 
not share the information with the very people who would have been in the 
best position to save American lives.

It is now impossible to draw any other conclusions than this overridingly 
obvious one: This five-week period of what will, in hindsight, be regarded 
as one of the most important in U.S. history, offers "real time," crystal 
clear documentation of appalling laziness and abject failure, from the 
White House all the way down to the White House press corps. What will Bush 
miss during his August nap this year?


Reply via email to