Forget dualbooting -- the best combo is a Mac for any of the DTP or graphix stuff you can't do on linux (and Macs are far beyond windoze in that respect anyway) and then linux for everything else. I do have both VirtualPC for the mac with '95 on it, and also Vmware for linux with '98 on it, but frankly I don't think I've booted either one more than once in the last year and a half, and that was only to run the DeLorme topo map.
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 11:22:18PM -0500, Gary Jeffers wrote: > My fellow Cypherpunks, > > I found this link about WinXP SP1 . SP stands for "service pack". The > article tells of some nasty goodies that MicroSoft has included > in it. The 2nd link has more info.. > > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/26911.html > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/26698.html > > > You know, sometime we are going to have to abandon MS. I've already got a > dual booting system: MS and Red Hat Linux. I am slowly > migrating functions to Linux. The (GNU) Linux's and the free BSD's are good > alternatives to MS. If you can't live without MS, then make > your computer system dual booting. Also, dual booting will allow you to > make a fairly easy migration to a DECENT operating system . > MS is getting more and more oppressive. > > > Yours Truly, > Gary Jeffers > > BEAT STATE!!!! -- Harmon Seaver CyberShamanix http://www.cybershamanix.com
