http://www.progressive.org/sept02/ivin0902.html
Remember the old saying about how to get the mule's attention? First you 
hit it upside the head with a heavy plank, then you gently say, "Hey, 
mule." The American people have just been hit upside the head with a plank: 
$7 trillion of what people thought they were worth disappeared in a giant 
"earnings restatement." And now it is time to gently suggest what can be 
done to fix this.
Or maybe not so gently, since failure to fix it is likely to cost so much 
that $7 trillion will look like chump change. Our political system is so 
broke it took seven years to react to the savings and loan crisis, which 
was caused by the political system in the first place. That cost us only 
$500 billion. If they take seven years to stop this hemorrhage, we'll be 
totally sunk.
Step Numero Uno: public campaign financing. This mess is not just about 
corporate greed; it is just as much about political corruption.
Perhaps the least edifying sight so far is that of politicians pointing 
their fingers at the CEOnistas and clucking over their greed. First and 
funniest was President Junior, whose entire business career was this very 
same corporate scandal writ small. The man is the mascot of crony 
capitalism. Listening to his lecture to Wall Street about their need for 
moral rearmament and better business ethics was first-rate entertainment.
Years of covering politics have given me a cast-iron stomach, but the sight 
of Representative Billy Tauzin, Republican of Louisiana, posing as a 
born-again populist is enough to gag a maggot. This is the same Billy 
Tauzin who led the charge on every sell-out to corporate special interests 
of the last ten years.
Then there's Mr. Morality, the oh-so-pious Senator Joe Lieberman, well 
watered by campaign contributions from the Big Five accounting firms to 
make sure they weren't regulated. Whew, what a stench!
The pols need to turn those pointing fingers right at themselves. Starting 
in 1994, when the Financial Accounting Standards Board was preparing to 
rule that stock options must be treated as a company expense--a step that 
would have reduced corporate earnings and thus deflated stock value--the 
high-tech and securities industries vehemently opposed the move. Lieberman 
leaned on the board to back down, and it did. Lieberman is number thirteen 
in the Senate for contributions from the securities and investment 
industry. That move set up the explosion in executive compensation and gave 
CEOs a huge incentive to artificially inflate their stock prices.
The next step was in 1995, when Congress passed the Private Securities 
Litigation Reform Act, which makes it harder for shareholders to sue 
corporations. This act also allowed executives to make absurd claims about 
future earnings by scrapping the old prohibition against forward-looking 
statements.
There are basically only two ways to control capitalism: One is by 
government regulation, and the other is through the courts. Wave after wave 
of "tort reform" made corporations increasingly sue-proof. The much 
maligned trial lawyers and their so-called frivolous lawsuits actually 
functioned like the sharks they are so often compared to. If a corporation 
stuck a hand outside the law, a shark would swim by and bite it off, as it 
were, by suing for lots of money, a lovely incentive for decorous corporate 
behavior. But the politicians have been killing off the sharks.
Bill Clinton vetoed the '95 Litigation Reform Act, but it was passed over 
his veto with help from Senator Chris Dodd of Connecticut, among other 
Democrats.
The third horror was the successful efforts in both 1999 and 2000 to 
prevent the SEC under Arthur Leavitt from forcing accounting firms to 
separate their auditing and consulting functions. Forty-six Senators and 
Representatives wrote Leavitt in protest. They received, on average, 
$93,000 in campaign contributions from the Big Five.
All of this is not the fault of corporate greedheads; it is the fault of a 
corrupted political system. It is a consequence of legalized bribery. It is 
about campaign finance. That is the "without which" nothing will come out 
of this mess.
Molly Ivins,Austin.
Time to dust off Jims old encrypted funding proposal from 96? 

Reply via email to