At 01:23 PM 9/18/02 -0700, Morlock Elloi wrote:
>> Better than a radar detector for emissionless, but visible, cops.
Over
>> the hill coverage. Issues of
>
>This will be banned under WIPO and copyright laws
Yep. Won't anyone think of the chiiiildren?
>I think that some radar detectors have this built-in.
Inter-("consumer")-node automatic communication of antisocial
information
over pirate protocols? I don't think so. Yet :-)
I'm suggesting that end-user-configurable RF comp/comm devices are a
quantum
step in the development of "consumer" electronics in the us-vs.-pigs
arms race.
Or could be.
Look dude, I'm just porting/downshifting the Rural Optical Signalling
Protocol
to a blog-like RF mesh network with a better horizon. You can ignore
those noise
bursts if you like :-)
The main problem is
>localisation - each district seem to be using different frequences.
Could it be
>that They are aware of dangers of the monoculture ?
Frequencies are just bit patterns to a digitally controlled oscillator.
DCOs are agile, dude.
Got spectrum?
