At 02:37 PM 10/1/02 -0700, Steve Schear wrote: >Court rules up-skirt peep cams legal > >In a ruling that could change fashions in Washington state, the supreme
>court there has ruled that "up-skirt cams" do not violate voyeurism laws. > >[Using almost identical logic cities around the country have passed >ordinances prohibiting the wearing of masks. So, by extension, might a >city pass an ordinance that prohibits a woman from wearing underwear with a >skirt? Enquiring legal minds want to know ;-) steve] And various theocracies might require, or restrict, beards there too :->
