---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 13:45:58 -0600 From: Chip Rosenthal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [eff-austin] state privacy protection - texas sucks
>From Eric Sinrod's mailing list <http://www.sinrodlaw.com> ... states are ranked for level of privacy protection. Where do you think our state winds up in the ranking? Yep, you guessed it. We suck. I am, however, a little surprised Texas ended up in the very bottom tier. I would have thought the statewide do-not-call list <http://www.puc.state.tx.us/ocp/telephone/donotcall.cfm> implemented this year would reflect favorably. It makes me a little concerned about their methodology. ----- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Eric_Sinrod_Mailing_List Subject: Sinrod Re States' Privacy Protection Date: 05 Dec 2002 12:52:41 -0500 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Does Your State Protect Personal Privacy? The state-by-state privacy verdict is in, so to speak. The recent 2002 "Compilation of State and Federal Privacy Laws," published by the Privacy Journal, ranks all 50 states and the District of Columbia in terms of the relative level of protection they provide for personal privacy. The compilation results offer a comparative analysis so that you can see how your state's privacy efforts fare relative to the rest of the nation. To learn more, please see my most recent column for USATODAY.com and Law.com at: http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/ericjsinrod/2002-12-04-sinrod_x.htm [snip] ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Chip Rosenthal * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.unicom.com/ Lawsuit Update: I Win, Domain Hijackers Lose * http://save.unicom.com/
