This article sets out some of the main problems faced by sex workers in their relationship with the State, and concludes with a brief interview with Jenn Clamen of the International Union of Sex Workers. You're self-employed, running a legal small business on a tight budget and want to advertise your services. For most, a card in the local shop window or phone box might be just the ticket. But not if you're a sex worker, it seems. Clamp down Though prostitution is legal, soliciting on the streets isn't. Until the Criminal Justice & Police Act came into force in 2001, the prostitute's tactic of advertising sex by putting cards in phone boxes was legal too � not anymore. It's estimated that 13m cards are distributed across Britain each year and in 2001 BT removed 150,000 from phone boxes in central London alone � though it didn't stop schoolboys swapping cards in playgrounds when the Pokemon craze died down! Apart from the waste of money, carding is now attracting severe penalties as the police and local councils clamp down.The police pose as clients and get the addresses of people selling sex. They are visited, warned, often the landlord is informed. With most landlords afraid of being charged with abetting prostitution, such a warning usually ends in eviction. The woman (and it usually is a woman, sometimes with children) is moved on again and again. Their livelihoods are lost as it takes time to re-build your client base. Immigration officials often accompany police, and women working illegally are issued a deportation order and dumped at the nearest airport. Sometimes the only way they can raise the airfare is to head back into town and go back on the streets. If they have been trafficked (smuggled into the country) they may still owe the traffickers their fare and be in immediate danger here and in their home countries. Cards at flats are confiscated and the card boys, if caught, face heavy fines, up to �1,000, or 28 days in jail. One operation in the area covered by right-wing Westminster Council (all-part of its family-friendly tourist strategy) led to 60 card boys being charged, though none of the women were. As Jenn Clamen says: "The real agenda is not getting rid of the cards, but getting rid of the women. Prohibition is unlikely to drive sex workers into convents but harassment will force them underground where there is less access to support networks and where they risk more violence." Interview Organise!: When was the union formed, what are its main policies, how many members does it have and what do they see as the main benefits of membership? Jenn: The IUSW was formed in 2000 and now has 100 members. It has recently affiliated to the GMB and its Sex Work & Fantasy Branch has 40 members. The main demands of the IUSW are: decriminalisation of all aspects of sex work involving consenting adults; the right to form and join professional associations or unions; zero tolerance of coercion, violence, sexual abuse, child labour, rape and racism; legal support for sex workers who want to sue those who exploit their labour; the right to travel across national boundaries and obtain work permits wherever we live; clean and safe places to work; the right to choose whether to work on our own or co- operatively with other sex workers; the absolute right to say no; access to training � our jobs require very special skills and professional standards; access to health clinics where we do not feel stigmatised; re-training programmes for sex workers who want to leave the industry; an end to social attitudes which stigmatise those who are or have been sex workers. O: What are the main benefits of membership? Jenn: The main benefits of membership are that being part of a collective group that is ostracised and generally doesn't get to enjoy all of the benefits of a free society, gives power and confidence to people in the sex trade. Being part of the GMB has the usual practical benefits: discounted travel insurance, free legal advice, compensation for injuries at work (although this only applies to people working in wholly `legal' aspects of the trade i.e. massage parlours or dance clubs). O: What are the main forms of discrimination faced by sex workers? Jenn: Because the law around sex work is so contradictory and ambiguous, it is very difficult to ensure that sex workers can be safe and healthy in their jobs. This in itself is discrimination. The Government has set up the law to feign approval of sex work, by making it `legal'. However, none of the activities around sex work (including living off the money earned) is legal. This too is discrimination. On a more practical level, sex work is not considered a real job, so people who sex work cannot enjoy the benefits of working in a `real' job i.e. compensation if hurt, health benefits, etc. O: Is sex work dangerous? Jenn: There is a lot of danger in sex work because of the lack of proper laws. Sex workers are exposed to a lot of violence from punters and pimps, if they have a pimp, because there are no laws to protect them. If raped or assaulted, proving it is difficult because generally the population thinks it's part of the job: many women who work on the street will tell you that this is exactly what police called to the scene will say. A lot of women are forced to work underground because they must remain out of sight so as not to get a fine for soliciting. This puts them in more danger, as they are not always familiar with the working area and the punters in that area. O: To what extent are sex workers able to control their transactions with clients and their employers (if any)? Jenn: Sex Workers are usually in control of the transaction. For women who work in flats, it's a simple transaction. There is usually a maid, who answers the phone and keeps the money, and a working girl. The punter comes in, requests a service, woman gives a price, money is exchanged � simple. Where a woman has a pimp, a lot of her money goes over to him or her, resulting in a lack of control. With regards to services, however, most women determine what services they offer, and how they offer them, bar none. If people are new to the industry, it obviously takes time for them to devise their own working regime, so they may not be in as much control as they would like to be. In some massage parlours and escort agencies, and even flats, the owner will demand the girl see a particular client she may not want to see, or perform certain services like oral sex without a condom. However, the answer to this dilemma is simple, move to another sex working job. If a woman wants control over her business, she will seize it. O: What is the general attitude of officialdom � police, social workers, local councils and so on? Jenn: The general attitude is that sex work is a pest. Most councils will deny that it exists in their area (very typical of posh suburban areas). At the same time they are beginning to use anti- social behaviour orders (introduced originally to deal with `neighbours from hell') against street women � if breached they face up to five years in jail. A lot of the police and general public think it should be decriminalised but still maintain a `not on my doorstep' attitude. There are a lot of people in favour of a `red-light district' where sex work would be `contained': fair enough, at least they are aiming for a decriminalised area. O: And the Government? Jenn: The Government will not make any efforts to change the law; this is the main problem. The current laws themselves are the real problem, the nuisance. I think there is a general attitude that if the law made more sense, there wouldn't be so many problems. In the meantime, while the laws don't make sense, people think that visible sex work (I stress visible because a lot of it is indoors) is a pest � even though many of the people with this attitude are punters themselves. O: What are the main other ways by which sex workers are controlled by society? Jenn: The lack of structure in the law controls the lives of sex workers. They cannot go public. They must live double lives. They must always be on guard because of a lack of safety. They must suffer with the stigma attached to sex working. They are not controlled as other people can be: most are confident and self-assured. But in general, it's the law that gets you down. O: Some people argue that street prostitution attracts kerb crawlers who accost women not interested in selling sex and are perceived as a menace to children. The trade seems to attract crime � especially drug-related crime � and can be a nuisance, affecting the whole neighbourhood. Are sex workers to blame for this and should they ply their trade indoors? Jenn: No. Street sex workers are not to blame for drugs or menacing punters. Many street workers are homeless and can't trade indoors. I have been to residents' meetings where this is suggested, but it's ridiculous: where would they go? They don't have homes. The main problem with street sex work (aside from complaints about mere visibility) is condoms and syringes around parks and schools. This is why needle exchanges and sex work projects exist, to help people dispose of them safely. The councils also have to train rubbish collectors to handle these things (with gloves, sterilizing equipment etc). Safety is the biggest issue in street sex work but I wouldn't blame the women themselves for a lack of it. The social context around street sex work does not allow for a dialogue between residents and working women. O: What are the IUSW's proposals for addressing these issues of perceived and actual nuisance, crime and safety? Jenn: The anti-kerb crawling campaign being mounted currently in some areas is not a safe or effective way of targeting punters or sex workers; it makes sex work more dangerous by pushing the women further underground and into working areas they are not familiar with. With regards to punters approaching women who aren't sex workers, there is danger because some punters can get rude and intimidating. A designated working area may solve that problem. Educating residents and council members so that they do not need to feel against the women is one way. Decriminalising an area where sex workers can work, shower, and see punters is another. Residents need to acknowledge sex workers as residents and come to an understanding together about safety in the neighbourhood. O: What change in the status of sex workers and society's attitudes to sex workers would you like to see? Jenn: Society, and especially Government, needs to pay attention to what is going on in the world, the fact that London is laden with sex and sex work, that there is a demand for it. That people need to feel protected. It would help if the double standard that most Britons have about sex was dumped, that the stereotypes of sleazy, broke sex workers was forgotten or changed for good. O: What are the means by which this could come about? Jenn: Decriminalisation of all aspects of adult sex work involving consenting adults. Accepting sex work as a profession and a choice. Legislation needs to be changed. An anarchist view As anarchists we may have an inkling of some of the problems sex workers face. We too lead double lives and often find ourselves arrested for doing things that up to a moment before were entirely legal! Though there's not as much demand for our politics as there seems to be for sex, more's the pity! We also recognise the truth that collective organisation brings strength and confidence. Some lessons have been well learnt. We would certainly support the formation of more IUSW branches and are glad to see that sex workers recognise the limitations of trade union membership! Where we differ perhaps is in expecting any change in attitude from Government or that legislation will do anything more than increase control and lessen perceived public nuisance while doing nothing to curb those who exploit or harm sex workers. ****************************************** >From Organise!, thrice yearly magazine of the Anarchist Federation (Britain/Ireland), now available in PDF format at: http://www.afireland.cjb.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.afed.org.uk http://flag.blackened.net/af/alba

Reply via email to