> Also, in the US, the police can request a "mail cover"
> (which means recording who all your snail mail is from)
> with much less legal formality than a search warrant,
> and if they get a warrant to open all your incoming mail,
> I don't think they're required to notify you.

Is there a way to RELIABLY find the mail was opened?

Reason: If the mail sent is eg. a CD with a set of OTP keys, then the
adversary gains next to nothing by intercepting it IF the interception is
detected (the keys just get discarded and new set is sent to another
address).
Then it could be possible to securely send large volumes of confidential
data by mail; you prepare the pairs of CDs - one with cryptographically
random data, one with the real data XORed by the first set. You send the
first set. If it arrives unopened (which can be communicated safely even
over an unsecured channel), you send the second set; if it arrives opened,
you generate the CD pairs again and send the new first set. If the
adversary intercepts only one half of the transported data, they gain
nothing more than the fact some amount of data was sent.

(Of course, hand-to-hand exchange is more secure, but it is suitable for
operative handling of keys in urban setting, not when an overseas flight
would come to question.)

One of my ideas was to put a small piece of film or photographic paper,
detect that it was exposed to light, but then the adversary can put in a
new piece of the light-sensitive material and reseal the package. The same
problem goes with the various kinds of seals.

Comments, hints, keywords to look up?

Reply via email to