LA Times: bush foreign policy is insane (english)
Tonta and the Mask Man 1:13am Thu Jan 2 '03
article#226280
When a holy 6 rag calls bush twisted, dangerous and insane, you know we are
in deep sheite. Feeling safe yet? You shouldn't be.
Washington's foreign policy is now less logical than Pyongyang's. A
starving dictatorship's clumsy blackmail attempts at least make some
twisted sense in that the Bush administration has refused, from its very
first days, to even discuss North Korea's persistent request for a
nonaggression pact with the United States.
...
We are the ones who continue to give legitimacy to the weapons of mass
destruction, threatening devastating preemptive strikes, including possible
use of nuclear weapons, against those who defiantly refuse to bend to the
will of Washington.
Meanwhile, the Bush administration remains detached from the destabilizing
Israeli-Palestinian nightmare, is struggling to gain footing against Al
Qaeda and is apparently indifferent to the successes of Muslim
fundamentalism in Chechnya, Lebanon, Yemen, Palestine and Pakistan.
Instead, we are mobilizing our massive forces against a weakened secular
dictator 6,000 miles away who doesn't seem to have had anything to do with
a series of devastating terrorist attacks.
What is happening here? Certainly not the construction of a coherent
foreign policy aimed at increasing the security of the United States or our
allies.
This is an administration that in two years has so mucked up our approach
to the world that merely applying the demands of logic is made to appear
unpatriotic.
full story:
http://www.latimes.com/la-oe-scheer31dec31,0,5409103.column
www.latimes.com/la-oe-scheer31dec31,0,54...
LA Times: bush foreign policy is insane (english)
Tonta and the Mask Man 1:13am Thu Jan 2 '03
article#226280
When a holy 6(?) rag calls bush twisted, dangerous and insane, you know we
are in deep sheite.
Feeling safe yet? You shouldn't be.
Washington's foreign policy is now less logical than Pyongyang's. A
starving dictatorship's clumsy blackmail attempts at least make some
twisted sense in that the Bush administration has refused, from its very
first days, to even discuss North Korea's persistent request for a
nonaggression pact with the United States.
...
We are the ones who continue to give legitimacy to the weapons of mass
destruction, threatening devastating preemptive strikes, including possible
use of nuclear weapons, against those who defiantly refuse to bend to the
will of Washington.
Meanwhile, the Bush administration remains detached from the destabilizing
Israeli-Palestinian nightmare, is struggling to gain footing against Al
Qaeda and is apparently indifferent to the successes of Muslim
fundamentalism in Chechnya, Lebanon, Yemen, Palestine and Pakistan.
Instead, we are mobilizing our massive forces against a weakened secular
dictator 6,000 miles away who doesn't seem to have had anything to do with
a series of devastating terrorist attacks.
What is happening here? Certainly not the construction of a coherent
foreign policy aimed at increasing the security of the United States or our
allies.
This is an administration that in two years has so mucked up our approach
to the world that merely applying the demands of logic is made to appear
unpatriotic.
full story:
http://www.latimes.com/la-oe-scheer31dec31,0,5409103.column
www.latimes.com/la-oe-scheer31dec31,0,54...
