Ah, the joys of Open Source military intelligence...
I guess it's not one of those Total Information Awareness things.
It would be fun, but I'm not even going to Google for this one.
A well-known non-US journalistic source reports:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/29026.html
DoD offering admin privileges on .mil Web sites
By Thomas C Greene in Washington
Posted: 24/01/2003 at 21:22 GMT
Care to register a .mil Web site of your own for free? The DoD has gone out
of its way to make it a snap. An unbelievably badly-protected admin
interface welcomes you to register whatever domain you please
(http://Rotten.mil anyone?), or edit anything they've already got. The
interface is so ludicrously unprotected that it's been cached by Google and
fails to mention that you must be authorized to muck about with it.
Incredibly, default passwords are cheerfully provided on the page.
Following an anonymous tip from an observant Reg reader, we've encountered
the page in question in the Google cache, and after a bit of our own poking
about have also discovered an equally unprotected (and Google-cached) admin
interface encouraging us to add a new user, like ourselves, say, which
requires no authentication.
All you have to do is find that page and you can set yourself up with a
user account, manage your new .mil Web site, fiddle about with other
people's .mil Web sites, and generally make an incredible nuisance of
yourself. We are, of course, straining against every natural, journalistic
impulse in our beings by neglecting to mention any useful search strings
with which to find it.
Another unprotected and cached page, this one discovered by our tipster,
lists traffic to a major DoD Web site by URL/IP address. This worries us
because it may list .mil sites and networked DoD machines that are not
public, not hotlinked anywhere, and which might contain (or be networked
with other machines that contain) sensitive data. Merely knowing that all
those URLs and IP addys are valid and owned by DoD would give a significant
advantage to attackers by narrowing their target area dramatically.
We have e-mailed the person who manages these sites - twice in fact - but
so far have not been graced with a reply. We were hoping that they might be
inclined to fix this mess quickly so that we could safely include the
details in our report. Unfortunately we have to withhold them until we're
confident that these security snafus are under control.
Ironically, US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld recently ordered DoD to
purge military Web sites of information that might benefit evildoers.
That's all well and good, but it might behoove the DoD to stop offering
them admin privileges first. .
---------------------------------------
- Re: DoD badly protected web form lets "users&q... Bill Stewart
- Re: DoD badly protected web form lets "us... Declan McCullagh
- Re: DoD badly protected web form lets "us... lcs Mixmaster Remailer
- Re: DoD badly protected web form lets &quo... Kevin S. Van Horn
