(Longish)
http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=232524&group=webcast

Nosecones of military planes don't like hammers.

It is sometimes justifiable to damage property if, for example, a door
has to be forced to access a burning house to save life. In relation to
the US war effort intent on killing innocent civilians in Iraq, there is
in a similar way a
legal excuse for non-violent direct action. A legal case of this sort was
won by three women in Britain who damaged a Hawk fighter plane which was
due to kill people in East Timor in January 1996."

Reply via email to