Wow, easy there, chief. I think you have some aggression you may want to let a professional address. Besides that...
I'm not crazy about everything that the government does, but there are trade- offs in a non-perfect society. One of them is monitoring the innocent to, in turn, attempt to prevent the guilty from trampling over everything, God willing. I'm pretty sure that your Jack-dipped cotton swab will fall under tampering and intentional abuse of law enforcement resources, so you will pay your fine, then come back here to complain about "the man" that is trying to take away your world of lawlessness and accountability. There are countries that are very differing in their laws and liberties. Don't lose hope by thinking that this is the only one for you. You can try a few of them until one suits your flavor. Isn't freedom great? Amen! Quoting Sunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > So you hook it up to a wad of cotton dipped in Jack... Whatever. Fuck > Big Brother. Fuck it in the ass until it squeals, then fuck it some more. > > ----------------------Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos--------------------------- > + ^ + :NSA got $20Bil/year |Passwords are like underwear. You don't /|\ > \|/ :and didn't stop 9-11|share them, you don't hang them on your/\|/\ > <--*-->:Instead of rewarding|monitor, or under your keyboard, you \/|\/ > /|\ :their failures, we |don't email them, or put them on a web \|/ > + v + :should get refunds! |site, and you must change them very often. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sunder.net ------------ > > On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Good job. You just caused law enforcement to ignore emitters from all cabs, > > > government, and police vehicles. > > > > My guess is that the unit will perform a self-check and emit a "broken" > signal > > instead of "drunk". Maybe the police will only pull over "broken" vehicles > not > > listed above, knowing that broken ones from average citizens are far > likelier > > to have been sabotaged. > >
