former military aide to General Norman Schwarzkopf has warned that a US-led
war against Iraq could turn into a disaster that echoes the bloody debacle
of Somalia rather than the relatively painless 1991 Gulf war.
Retired Colonel Mike Turner, who also served as military planner with the
US Joint Chiefs of Staff, believes the Bush administration is ignoring
potential risks � some that could cost the US dearly.
"There's a saying in military circles: We always fight the last war. It
means that too much focus on past enemy behaviour can easily lead to
misjudging an enemy capability in the future," he said.
"So I asked myself today which war will this be: Desert Storm or Somalia?
In 1991, we had four iron-clad prerequisites for war with Iraq: a clear
political end state, overwhelming force to achieve a quick and decisive
victory, a viable Arab coalition to avoid empowering Arab extremists, and
absolutely no Israeli involvement to avoid a global holy war.
"In Somalia, we ignored the most critical of these lessons. Mission creep
turned our original objective of humanitarian aid into simply 'Get Aidid,'
the Somali factional leader we were battling. We committed US troops to a
high-risk military operation in an urban area with extraordinarily
dangerous variables in play on the battlefield, and with insufficient
firepower."
Colonel Turner said the US had made the mistake of fixing its sights early
on ridding the world of Saddam Hussein. This plan had met stiff opposition
from the uniformed staff within the Pentagon, but the administration had
chosen this focus regardlessly.
Colonel Turner outlined a worst-case scenario: "Within hours of our attack,
Saddam launches Scuds on Israel. Israel's government launches a full-scale
attack on Iraq, creating a holy war. Saddam, threatened with his own
survival, uses chemical and biological weapons and human shields. He
torches his own oil fields, thousands of his own people are killed. Photos
of US soldiers amid landscapes of Iraqi civilian bodies blanket the world
press which aligns unanimously against the US."
He then envisaged the US left to administer a post-Saddam Iraq with minimal
international co-operation and open to terror attacks from al- Qa'ida.
North Korea could take advantage and start exporting nuclear weapons.
"These are not remote possibilities, but in my view reasonable, possibly
even likely outcomes," he concluded.
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=387234
