Another possibility occurred to me. It might be possible to use the
802.11-like devices for this purpose. The problem for this application
with Wi-Fi is its focus on high data rate and therefore low process
gain. But there is no inherent reason why almost the same circuits
(perhaps even the off-the-shelf PC cards themselves) couldn't be
re-purposed for used at lower effective data rates and higher process gain
for much greater range and interference immunity while still operating
within the FCC Part 15 guidelines.
As I recall most of the notebook cards have a max output of about 80
mW. Each of the 5 channels in the 2.4 GHz band can support up to 11
mbps. If you assume that you will use this for stereo broadcasting then
only 128 kbps offers a pretty good quality .mp3 This is a data rate ratio
of 85 :1 or about 18 dB. For every 6 dB of link margin improvement a
signal's range is doubled. 18 dB should, all other things being
equivalent, extend the device range by 8 times. (If data rates were
lowered to those now common for PCS and used for that sort of purpose, link
margins would expand by another 9-12 dB.)
steve
- Idea: Sidestepping low-power broadcast regulations with in... Thomas Shaddack
- Re: Idea: Sidestepping low-power broadcast regulation... Steve Schear
- Re: Idea: Sidestepping low-power broadcast regulation... adg
- Re: Idea: Sidestepping low-power broadcast regulation... Tyler Durden
- Re: Idea: Sidestepping low-power broadcast regula... Steve Schear
- Re: Idea: Sidestepping low-power broadcast regulation... Tyler Durden
- Re: Idea: Sidestepping low-power broadcast regula... Steve Schear
- Re: Idea: Sidestepping low-power broadcast regulation... Tyler Durden
- Re: Idea: Sidestepping low-power broadcast regula... Steve Schear