US is currently run by thugs supported by the cheering consumer crowds that have been 
bred and conditioned to be infantile.

So the situation is best evaluated in the "Lord of Flies" context. As long as masters 
are winning and have stronger army than anyone else, nothing will change. You will 
notice that they never engage army unless they have several orders of magnitude 
strength advantage.

Which means that only small countries are in danger.

There are two consequences of this:

(a) there is no likely grouping of bigger entities to strike back - and that is the 
only response that will change US behavior. Until US is beaten and have suffered 
occupation and complete military defeat nothing much will change. This will eventually 
happen as history demonstrates that empires are not capable of sustained supremacy 
(due to the negative selection within among other factors - incidentally, the brain 
drain in the last 3-4 years have changed direction - this is the most significant 
metric.) But not any time soon.

(b) smaller countries will strive to arm themselves with effective weaponry. The 
window for this is closing and in few years there will be two clearly defined clubs: 
untouchables and fair game. It looks that most of the arab world is heading for the 
fair game status and they are understandably unhappy with it.

The main question is - will the income from newly and soon to be acquired colonies be 
sufficient to prevent confrontation between US and the rest of developed and armed 
world? 

Reply via email to