On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 08:46:17 -0500, Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In other words, he won because some hillbilly was afraid that the guy at the > local 7-11 was going to blow up his chicked farm. Those of us living close > enough to "Ground Zero" to smell it back in those days are apprarently less > than convinced.
As the article notes, GWB *improved* his showing in NY over the 2000 election. Are you implying that the US won't be attacked again? I could follow your ad-hominem attack with one about mincing homosexuals, but we both know that singlularity of voters on either side is incorrect, and does nothing to forward the discussion. > So: A 'moral values' question for Cypherpunks. Does this election indict the > American people as being complicit in the crime known as "Operation > Freedom"? (I notice everyone forgot about that name.) Of course it does. That's what a republic is. But who's going to 'indict' us? The UN? Maybe after we finish the trials for their self-dealing on the 'Oil for Food' program (as Orwellian a title as the Patriot Act had). -- Pete Capelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.capelli.org PGP Key ID:0x829263B6 "Those who would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin, 1759