I wasn't actually expecting anonymity. I wrote directly to RAH, asking him politely to edit down his posts, and simply post a few lines and a pointer. Not pointing out his faults in public was simply good manners. His response boils down to 'fuck you'.
Cypherpunks has a very loose charter, but it is not the 'everything and anything RAH thinks is neat' list. Peter > > Someone wrote: > > > > At 10:23 AM -0500 12/21/04, Somebody wrote: > > RAH, if you want to anonymize a quoted email, it helps if you > remove the > In-Reply-To: and References: headers. > > > >What the hell does an article about gypsy > > >mechanics have to do with cypherpunks? > > > > I plead anarchic markets, m'lord. Emerging phenomena, and > all that, in > > spite all regulation to the contrary. >
