* Jack Lloyd: > http://theory.csail.mit.edu/~yiqun/shanote.pdf
Thanks for the pointer. > No real details, just collisions for 80 round SHA-0 (which I just confirmed) > and 58 round SHA-1 (which I haven't bothered with), plus the now famous work > factor estimate of 2^69 for full SHA-1. > > As usual, "Technical details will be provided in a forthcoming paper." I'm not > holding my breath. In addition, there's no trace of the second-preimage attack some persons recently alluded to.
