Wesley Craig wrote:
On 08 Aug 2006, at 12:59, Ken Murchison wrote:
Paul Turgyan wrote:
I can see where you want reconstruct to correct all problems with a
mailbox,
but after validating cyrus.expunge why not just let it be, and let
cyr_expire handle
the deletion. This way, as you said, a user can unexpunge those
messages if he wants.
I can't say that I disagree with you. I have this eerie feeling that
there is a reason that I chose to delete the expunged messages. Maybe
the Fastmail guys can remember.
This is what I found on the subject:
https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=2412
Just to be clear, if we're in agreement on how reconstruct should work,
Are we in agreement? Paul's patch (bug #2866) actually unexpunges the
messages. I thought that folks we arguing that cyrus.expunge and the
references messages should be left alone and omitted from cyrus.index.
then we will submit a patch. We're also having issues with non-unique
mailbox IDs. I'd like reconstruct to detect non-unique mailbox IDs and
assign new mailbox IDs as appropriate. Any comments on that?
Sounds reasonable.
--
Kenneth Murchison
Systems Programmer
Project Cyrus Developer/Maintainer
Carnegie Mellon University
