Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
Do we have a roadmap for what else people want on the 2.4 branch?
I'd be happy to put a bit more effort into polishing up those features
that are there so we can ship a 2.4 soonish. Say by April next year,
which gives us 6 months to prepare.
My original vision for 2.4 was to be compliant with the LEMONADE v2 profile.
Sounds like a good plan :)
At this point is can morph into anything we want. Some of the 2.4
features required changes that I felt were too in depth to put into
a relatively stable 2.3.
I'm pretty close to having the time to dive back into the 2.4 code.
The first thing that needs to be done is to merge all of the new 2.3
stuff into 2.4.
Sure. I'm happy to put the more unstable stuff (even including the
charset changes) into 2.4. I just want to have some idea that they
won't get stuck waiting for some lemonade scented towlettes forever.
Is Lemonade still alive? I haven't heard much about it, and I'm pretty
sure I read a couple of articles/BLOGs that the initiative was
essentially dead.
IETF Lemonade WG successfully completed all work with publication of
Lemonade Profile (RFC 5550) in August 2009. Multiple implementations of
various parts of it exist, including opensource implementations such as
Dovecot and Zimbra (and Cyrus, of course).
