Dan White wrote:
On 25/05/10 17:44 -0400, Dave McMurtrie wrote:
Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 05:22:55PM -0400, Matt Selsky wrote:
What do people think of having the cyrus-devel list CC'd on all new
Bugzilla bugs? This might increase awareness of bugs being filed
and new patches being submitted.
At the moment, new bugs are only seen directly by Ken (thought
everyone else has access).
Fantastic idea. If there are enough people who don't like it, then we
can always have a separate list - but we need something like that.
Agreed. I'll put this on my todo list and take care of it tomorrow.
I'll hazard a guess that I'll spend 45 minutes staring at the
bugzilla web interface before I finally end up manually editing the
backend database to accomplish this. If anyone actually knows how to
do this and would like to save me some time (and sanity) please let
me know.
Dave,
Look for useqacontact.
First, thanks for saving me a ton of time, Dan. useqacontact was set to
"off", and I changed that so it's now on.
I noticed that pretty much every component of the Cyrus IMAP product
already had a QA Contact defined as cyrus-bugzi...@lists.andrew.cmu.edu,
which would, as the address implies, be delivered to the cyrus-bugzilla
list.
The archives of this list show that some amount of mail was already
being sent there, but if useqacontact does what it's documented to do,
this list should now begin getting a lot more mail.
Is everyone okay with just keeping things the way they are configured
now, assuming that the mail is actually being sent out, or would you
rather I change the QA contact to be cyrus-devel@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
instead of cyrus-bugzi...@lists.andrew.cmu.edu?
Thanks,
Dave
--
Dave McMurtrie, SPE
Email Systems Team Leader
Carnegie Mellon University,
Computing Services
