On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 08:06:39AM -0400, Wesley Craig wrote: > For duplicate db, how about not syncing? > > I don't have a problem with exposing the interface.
Yeah, well - that's an option - particularly since we toss it away on restart anyway at the moment. Though I'd prefer not to do that. Actually, I'd _like_ to have duplicate db entries synced via replication - at least as an option. Otherwise failover isn't totally seamless. I want connecting clients to be unable to see the difference at all (unless they parse the hostname from the banner of course) I'm going to have a hack at it. Bron.
