On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:10:12AM +0200, Kristóf Katus wrote: > We do not think that it is worth the effort to fiddle around with the actual > format of the date. [... good arguments ...]
I agree. The date should be in there and it should be in the exact text format of the header - no point fiddling it. I believe the duplicate DB is already storing an MD5 of a bunch of fields as the 'key' anyway, so it doesn't really matter what you seed into the MD5. I'll have a proper look at the patches in a bit. I'm on holiday right now. Bron.
