On 09/07/2011 03:29 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote:
Georg C. F. Greve wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 September 2011 09.29:48 Georg C. F. Greve wrote:
> > > 10. The /vendor/kolab/folder-type annotation should be updated
now that
> > >
> > > SPECIALUSE has been made an RFC
> >
> > I think that is a very good idea. This should likely be added to
KEP 9,
> > which is still in drafting stage, so easy to extend.
>
> I've taken a look at the RFC today. It seems to only support the
/private/
> namespace. That would not work for the folder-type annotation,
because the
> type needs to be visible also to other users with which this folder is
> shared.
>
> Or am I missing something and there is a /public/ annotation as well?
>
It uses SHOULD in where I could find a reference to the private rfc
5464 namespace.
It thus allows for the shared namespace to be used as well, in my
interpretation of the word SHOULD as described in rfc 2119.
It also provides a short list of "allowed" special uses... I think it
needs to be extended either way,
and the extended version could allow shared :)
Bron.
