Hi Nicola. Thanks for the invitation, Unfortunately it was too short notice, and I missed it.
When is the next one? Thanks Raymond 2016-02-28 22:17 GMT-05:00 Nicola Nye via Cyrus-devel < cyrus-devel@lists.andrew.cmu.edu>: > Hi Raymond, > > The next meeting is at 11am UTC/10am AEDT Monday Feb 29th. (In other > words: in a few hours from now) > > https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/g4xnqjjb5zvomzeb4kqvja3fz4a > > Looking forward to hearing your news. > > Nicola > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016, at 01:39 AM, Raymond Poitras via Cyrus-devel wrote: > > Hi Bron > > Sorry for the delay and thank you for pushing this work to master. > > A) While doing this, some of the logic was broken. (This is now fix.) > B) The new solution works very well with a mix of archive (in object > storage) and non archive (on regular spool) emails. > C) Unarchive have been fix. (was used previously to remove email from > object storage. Now a new function is used for that). > D) Include reconstruct support. Works very well if message.db file is > reliable. > > Please let me know if you can update master again from here > https://github.com/RaymondPo/cyrus-imapd/tree/Cyrus-OpenIO > > When is the next meeting? Jean-Francois and I would like to attend > > Regards > Raymond > > > 2015-10-13 8:03 GMT-04:00 Bron Gondwana <br...@fastmail.fm>: > > I've pushed the objectstorage code based on Raymond and Jean-Francois's > work to master. It's almost exactly what was on Raymond's branch with just > a couple of modifications. > > 1) updated for some API changes I'd made to archiving in append.c > 2) fixed compilation under warn-unused-variables > 3) normalised logic between append_fromstage and append_copy for handling > objectstorage errors by creating non-ARCHIVED files. > 4) fixed file copy in mailbox_archive to work the same way as the file > moves, where it correctly passes the source/destination file to > objectstorage and gets the file back, so unarchive works. > > WARNING WARNING WARNING: while I've tested that normal operation and > normal archive file operation (non-objectstorage) works correctly with > Cassandane and FastMail experimental branch, I haven't done more than > rudimentary testing with the dummy objectstorage. > > I'm almost positive that reconstruct won't work correctly with object > storage turned on right now. > > This is still very much work in progress - but putting it on master means > that the code will be maintained and updated as other API changes are made. > > Thanks Raymond and Jean-Francois for all your work on this. I hope it > gets more testing and use. > > Cheers, > > Bron. > > -- > Bron Gondwana > br...@fastmail.fm > > >
