James, I didn't know about this RFC, but I just read it and that's exactly what is needed!

Ken, +1 for imapsieve :)

*From:* James Cassell Via Cyrus-devel
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 08, 2017 13:15
*To:* Cyrus Devel
*Subject:* Re: Cyrus Sieve futures

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017, at 02:36 AM, Anatoli via Cyrus-devel wrote:

Another question (just wondering if it's in your (or other devs) plans
and its feasibility): is it practically possible to implement for Sieve
something like "run the rules on X folder (+ subfolders)" same way as
local rules in most MUAs could be applied to already stored mails? I
find lack of this feature as the only (but notable) downside to Sieve vs
local rules.

imapsieve would effectively solve this.  You can trigger rules to run on 
specific messages by setting/clearing an imapflag/keyword on that message.  You 
can run rules on a folder by setting a flag on all messages in the folder.

V/r,
James Cassell



Reply via email to