Hi,we're only getting started with replication, so I can't contribute any useful comments, but your post raised two questions for me:
This only affects the "new", post-3.0 replication protocol, right? We're planning a migration from 2.4 to 3.0 using replication, and I'd like to be aware of all potential issues we might encounter.
Hey - here's me posting something to the public list instead of internal FastMail slack. We've been really bad at making our random ruminations public, sorry. Tomorrow (Tues 27th) 2pm Melbourne time, I'm going to be meeting with ellie and maybe Partha in the Melbourne office with a whiteboard and a screen to flesh out some ideas for things we can do to fix some of the issues that came up after a recent machine failure event at FastMail.
<snip>
b) there are over 1000 mailboxes, and the log file got deduplicated and then run in sets, and we had this: sync_log MAILBOX Z sync_log MAILBOX B (for a rename of Z to B)
Where and when does deduplication happen? -- Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyertal 121, Zimmer 2.02 Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK) Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - Tel. +49-221-470-89578
pgpoB1WVZ1OML.pgp
Description: PGP signature