On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 22:14 +0100, Jorge Bastos wrote: > Can you give me a detailed explanation on what you did?
And in particular, is there anything we could do to improve the documentation for the cyrus-sasl2 Debian package(s)? We've made some documentation improvements in the testing/unstable version, so you may want to compare: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-cyrus-sasl2/cyrus-sasl-2.1/trunk/debian/README.Debian?op=file&rev=0&sc=0 http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-cyrus-sasl2/cyrus-sasl-2.1/trunk/debian/sasl2-bin.README.Debian?op=file&rev=0&sc=0 That's in addition to the upstream documentation. I believe lack of documentation of common use cases as well as an overview for system administrators is one of the major stumbling blocks -- people find outdated HOWTO's and other information in various places and then become utterly confused when nothing seems to fit together. Cheers, -- Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
