On Apr 7, 2008, at 5:48 PM, Rahul Garg wrote: > > Quoting Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Thanks for answering. Do you mind if I forward this response to the >> cython mailing list? >> >> - Robert > > 1. Please forward if appropriate. Also include this reply please :) > > 2. I forgot to ask : Do you use some particular tests/benchmarks > etc? I can try and adapt those to Spyke-syntax if some test cases > are available.
Not much, but Stefan Behnel did do some tests at http://codespeak.net/ pipermail/cython-dev/2008-March/000107.html . > 3. Looking forward : with function annotations in Python-3k it > might actually be a good idea to work towards a unified syntax. > That way code will be portable b/w the 2 compilers and can also be > adopted by other tools like editors, debuggers and such. Of course > this is just an idea off the top of my head so need to look into > more details. Yes, this would be very good. We certainly plan to make use of function annotations (and decorators) to be able to specify types. - Robert _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
