On Apr 18, 2008, at 2:25 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>>>  BTW, any specific reason you took these discussions off-list (as
>>>> I think they would be general interest?)
>>> Ups! just because I simply pick 'reply' in Gmail, and you continued
>>> the thread writting to me and CC'ing to the list. In other mailing
>>> lists configuration, the 'reply-to' is by default set to the list.
>>
>>> BTW, why cython-devel list does not specify a 'reply-to' by default
>>> being the list itself?
>>
>> This has annoyed me too, but it just now hit me that I could probably
>> go in and change it. Done.
>
> I actually find the changed behaviour annoying. I'm quite capable  
> of deciding
> who I want to reply to. A "reply all" is the intuitively obvious  
> thing to do
> when replying to all members of the mailing list. Currently, there  
> is no
> difference between "reply"ing to the author of an e-mail and  
> replying to the list.
>
> Normally, when I hit "reply all", my e-mail client (Thunderbird)  
> will reply to
> the author directly and to the list in CC. Mailman handles that  
> just fine, and
> it just feels right. When I hit "reply", I find it quite obvious  
> that I want
> to reply to the author. So, when I want to take a discussion off- 
> line, I have
> to hit "reply" (or "reply-all"), delete the addressee copied from the
> "reply-to" header and then copy the e-mail address of the author  
> over to the
> e-mail. Now, that's annoying.
>
> It was definitely not the Cython list that was broken here. Any  
> chance we
> could change that back?


I like using the reply-to header because I want to avoid accidentally  
taking discussions offline (and even if I'm really careful I can't  
change the behavior of others). It is only in the (uncommon) cases of  
taking it offline that I want to stop and think about who is in the  
recipient list.

Something like this is clearly a matter of opinion. I think we should  
have a poll among those who actually use the list. My vote is +1 to  
using the reply-to header. Yours is obviously -1. I'm willing to  
concede on a tie but lets see if anyone else has an opinion.

- Robert

_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev

Reply via email to