On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Brian Granger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Robert Bradshaw
>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > On Apr 25, 2008, at 10:00 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>  >
>  > > Hi,
>  > >
>  > > I must admit I've never read the PSF license until today. However, Cython
>  > is
>  > > officially licensed under the PSF license. That doesn't really make 
> sense,
>  > as
>  > > this license is specific to Python itself. It is a license between the 
> PSF
>  > and
>  > > the users of Python - however, we can't speak for the PSF, and thus can't
>  > > really decide to distribute software under that license...
>  > >
>  > > I don't think the PSF will complain about this status, but wouldn't
>  > something
>  > > like the MIT or BSD license help us get back into state "legal" here?
>  > >
>  >
>  >  Good point. We chose the PSF license because we want to make it easy to
>  > become part of the Python standard library (or at least be used everywhere
>  > Python itself can be), and didn't want the hassle of worrying about
>  > re-licensing later on.
>  >
>  >  As you mention, and is explained in more detail here, PSF doesn't work.
>  >
>  >  http://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonSoftwareFoundationLicenseFaq
>  >
>  >  I propose that we go with the Apache 2.0 as per their suggestion (MIT and
>  > BSD are nice, but then would we worry about having to re-license later on?
>  > I'm not sure.)
>
>  I am not very familiar with the Apache 2.0 license.  But, I am not
>  sure I follow you about BSD/MIT making it difficult to relicense
>  later.  Could you elaborate?
>
>  Also, what are the main reasons for going with the Apache 2.0 license?
>   BSD/MIT seem like they might be better suited for general purpose
>  projects.  Just curious.

Does all code that goes into Python have to have its
copyright signed over to the PSF?   Or do they just requite
that code have the PSF license, but anybody can have the
copright?  That's the real issue here.

Currently everybody who contributes
to Cython has copyright on their contributions.

This could be a problem.

 -- William
_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
Cython-dev@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev

Reply via email to