Hi, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > Unless somebody *really* needs the increased speed right away, I think > this is the wrong way ahead.
I'm totally not advocating the "reimplement Cython in itself" route. I was just trying to get rid of things that are not really required, so that we can concentrate on the things that must be fixed in Cython soon. Removing the yield statement (a single one!) lifts the burden of having to implement closures *and* generators before we can compile Cython. I will certainly not keep you from implementing them anyways, just to be able to put it back in. Although looking at the specific code section, I didn't feel like it really needs an iterator, a list comprehension would work just fine here. Anyway, most of what I did was fixing bugs in Cython, mainly removing broken code (we should get a custom of running pychecker from time to time) and rewriting code that will stop working in Py3. Stefan _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list Cython-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
