Hi, Gary Furnish consistently continues to top-post: > The canonical example of a project that uses trac is Sage: > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac
obviously :) > Normally we attach patches to a ticket and then just comment them in > the ticket associated with the patch. This associates the bug/feature > ticket with the patch (as opposed to needing two systems if you went > with something like codeview + launchpad). Launchpad can do these things, but it lacks hg integration. > Compared to trac, > launchpad is slow for webpage response time. I rarely had a problem with that. Maybe we're just using it from different time zones. > It is also slow on > ticket creation time (I can create a ticket for a given item in maybe > 30 seconds on one page in trac, whereas launchpad has so much > complexity it is significantly more time consuming, requires a > multipage creation step, etc). I can't second that either. In launchpad, you write a subject and on submit it will tell you (a goodie I really like) if it found any possible matches amongst the existing tickets. You can then look at them or decide to write a new ticket. I found that totally straight forward (even the first time I used it) and very helpful for unexperienced users. Stefan _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
