Stefan Behnel wrote: >> for x < i < y: >> ... > > while this is shorter, it also breaks existing code - although I assume you > left the old syntax in?
Yes, it will be there for a while, although it will produce a deprecation warning. Ultimately I would like there to be One Way to do it. >>* There are two new builtin functions, typecheck() and >> issubtype(), for checking the types of arguments more safely >> (since isinstance and issubclass can be fooled). > > Could you elaborate on the actual problem here? It's possible for an object to lie about its class to isinstance() via its __class__ attribute. This is not acceptable when you need to ensure that the object has a particular C layout. > Could you imagine using our doctest based test runner as well? To do what, exactly? -- Greg _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list Cython-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
