Robert Bradshaw wrote: > Yes, that is true. We are not trying to re-invent C++ here (which is > powerful but at the expense of a much steeper learning curve).
If you were going to reinvent some parameterised type system, I'd suggest reinventing Eiffel instead -- it has quite a nice one, without any of the bizarrities of C++ templates. Another nice model to follow would be Haskell (although I'd excuse you for skipping the typeclasses if you weren't feeling up to it. :-) -- Greg _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
