On 5/16/08, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > What it does mean is that you have to ship two separate sets of C > files, which is why I'm pushing for this specific change to be > decided at C compile time.
Indeed. That would be a bit painfull for large project with many generated C files. It would not affect to much to my two current project. as I only generate a single but big 2MB C source. > To be clear, I think it makes sense for a > string literal to be a str. I'm on your side. Because of that, I pushed for the other way, I mean, iff one really want to use a byte string literal with DATA (for example, for sending a ascii data trough a wire), then explicitly use b"abc". But perhaps I'm still missing some point here... -- Lisandro Dalcín --------------- Centro Internacional de Métodos Computacionales en Ingeniería (CIMEC) Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (INTEC) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) PTLC - Güemes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594 _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
