В сообщении от Среда 21 мая 2008 Robert Bradshaw написал(a): > On May 21, 2008, at 4:18 AM, Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > > В сообщении от Вторник 20 мая 2008 Stefan > > Behnel написал(a): > >> Kirill Smelkov wrote: > >>> Greg Ewing wrote: > >>>> So I think it's probably a good thing having Cython as a > >>>> separate project where people are free to try out all their > >>>> wild ideas. Then when the dust has settled I can take the > >>>> best ideas and fold them back into Pyrex. > >>>> > >>>> Think of it as the "Pyrex-Unstable" branch if you like. :-) > >>> > >>> Yes, I'll think of Cython as Pyrex-Unstable (or Pyrex- > >>> Experimental :) from > >>> now on. > >> > >> I don't think that's consistent with the way the Cython project > >> sees itself. > > > > Oops :) > > To clarify, I think the main difference between Cython and Pyrex is > that Cython aims to be a good Python compiler, not just a way to > create extension types. I think most of the differences in philosophy > can be traced back to this point. > > Also, in terms of development, Greg wants to review and understand > every line that goes into Pyrex, which makes it slower to accept new > features. We still do quality review on the code contributed to > Cython but the process is much more open.
Sounds good. Would then you or some other Cython developer please review my constify.patch submitted more than one week ago: http://trac.cython.org/cython_trac/ticket/9 ? It is just an RFC (Request For Comments), but still, I've got no response regarding the patch itself. Thanks, Kirill. _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
