Hi again, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > If it helps with the funny feeling, the string is only parsed directly in > the constructor for TreeFragment (and it accepts a more directly created > node structure too). So the string disappears from the story after module > load time; from there it is only tree node manipulation (the TreeFragment > acts like a template which is cloned while substituting nodes on the > clone). So there's nothing that requires the string but notational > convenience.
:) I guess I missed that bit on first read. But that still doesn't get me convinced that parsing the template at module load time is a good idea. Having straight forward node creation code, especially if it can be bootstrapped by a node dumper, sounds like a better trade-off to me. Stefan _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
