Eric Jonas wrote: > I'm a bit confused why > you suggest that the reduce method should return the type as the first > element of the tuple -- I thought it had to be a function?
I don't think it has to be strictly a function, just a callable object. Probably the reason the docs call it a function is that before the type/class unification, builtin types weren't classes, so you had to define a function to create one. However I agree with Lisandro that there are probably better ways than using __reduce__ if you want it to work well with subclassing. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
