Hi,

Brian Granger wrote:
> I think the prange proposal is a very solid one and look forward to
> see what becomes of this.

I'm actually not so happy with it. It changes the behaviour and meaning of the
for loop (i.e. the "for" keyword) based on the thing that is iterated on.
IMHO, the thing we are discussing here is not about sequential loops at all
but about parallel execution.

Stefan

_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev

Reply via email to