Anyway, I really believe it is a good idea to ship the generated sources with your release tarballs. Then the users of your releases do not even need to have Cython installed to build your distribution.
Cython is gaining more and more features and fixes every week. I'm really happy with this fast enhacement process, then I'm always running on head of cython-devel repo. And this also helps to Cython core developers, as they some extra code outside the Cython test suite being continuouly built and possible regresions being catched. Of course, perhaps the above comments do not fit well with your workflow; in such case, just forget about it. On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Aaron DeVore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm really happy with the automatic isinstance -> PyObject_TypeCheck change, > but another question comes up. How do I make my code backward compatible? > Just having isinstance be slower on older versions (pre 0.9.8.2) would work, > but there would still be a performance hit. > > My first thought is to use Lisandro's hack > (http://codespeak.net/pipermail/cython-dev/2008-September/002358.html) in > the immediate future until Cython 0.9.8.2+ is more widely adopted. Does that > sound like the best option? > > -Aaron DeVore > > _______________________________________________ > Cython-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev > > -- Lisandro Dalcín --------------- Centro Internacional de Métodos Computacionales en Ingeniería (CIMEC) Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (INTEC) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) PTLC - Güemes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594 _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
