> This works for me: > > import cython > > @cython.locals(x=int, y=cython.p_int) > def foo(x): > y = cython.address(x) > print x + cython.sizeof(y) + cython.sizeof(cython.p_int) > print cython.compiled > > foo(34)
Wow, this works too for me (I was trying that xx case above). This is what I get with pure python: 36 False and cythonized: 42 True > Exactly how to do this with decorators (and/or automatically) is less > clear (syntax-wise, and there are more technical issues about > signatures matching, etc.). What you can do is write an > accompanying .pxd file which will, of course, be ignored by Python, > but can declare cdef classes/methods/etc for Cython. Then your class > and def statements will be appropriately coerced when you compile. This brings me the idea, why not to just take the current syntax and just generate a pure Python one from it? That way one also needs to maintain just one codebase, only it will by the Cython one, but it could always be used in Pure python. For some reason I prefer the pure python syntax approach though. Ondrej _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
