Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Oct 10, 2008, at 1:40 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > > >> The initial syntax proposed avoids these problems. I understand that >> this was probably much easier, OTOH it might be better not to have a >> feature rather than having a confusing feature... >> > > Yes, I'd like to support the original syntax too, but I think this > will be useful. I don't think it's too confusing. > OK I'm convinced and +1. But then I'm leaning against ever supporting the original syntax, as that means less language complexity to worry about everywhere. But that is not the issue at stake here.
(BTW I was referring to the LHS only, I support Robert in using a list for the RHS.) Dag Sverre _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
