On Oct 31, 2008, at 1:38 PM, Stephane DROUARD wrote: > Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > >>> It seems the current community values speed more, otherwise they >>> would just be using Python directly. >> >> Indeed > > Me too for sure. > > The fact is that I'm currently porting pure Python and SWIG modules to > Cython. > Some issues I'm having are due to a different behaviour between > Cython and > Python. And they are not so easy to find, because my first reaction > is to > review my code, not to consider the code generated by the tool(s) > may be > "guilty". > > I would be happy to have switches at Cython level that ensure Python > compatibility, then enable optimizations, ideally one by one, > helping me to > fastly identify where to look at. > > Moreover, having thoses switches would let me decide whether I fix > the issue > now or later on, according to my priorities.
I would be happy to have switches like this too, though for most cases the default would probably be set for speed rather than correctness. - Robert _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
