Robert Bradshaw wrote:

> To clarify, I would like to see the ability to move compiled (.pyd/.so)
files around
> and have it just work.

> I am just worried that it will be easy to break things (in unexpected
ways) by doing
> this, and I don't want a feature that only sometimes works.

I fully agree with that too.

And what I'm doing is clearly not to provide patches that solve my own
issues, but really tries to get Cython modules behave as close as possible
like Python modules.

> However, I think I'll be in a much more "experimental" mood after this
next release. If
> you can produce patches that does what you want, with tests that show it
does, then I
> would certainly want to include it!

I've first tried to see if I can patch Cython itself. But the structure is
quite complex, and I finally abandoned this idea and decided to patch the
generated C code.
This is why I've posted patches relative to the generated C code, hoping
that someone knowing the compiler structure could integrate them.
Particularly the patches I've proposed are really simple.

Is it be acceptable? 

But first, you need to be conviced that this goes on the right direction
(Python compatibility) and this really solves it in all situations. And I
understand your doubts.

Cheers,
Stephane

_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev

Reply via email to