On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Michael Abshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Behnel wrote: >> Hi, >> >> William Stein wrote: >>> I think it would >>> possibly be very good to port this signal stuff into Cython itself (why >>> not?). >> >> Yes, but... :) >> >> It would have to be explicit to avoid unnecessary overhead in time-critical >> code (e.g. loops may or may not be a good candidate for signal checking, >> depending on how tight they are), and it wouldn't necessarily work in calls >> to external libraries. > > I guess William's point was that the signal semantic should be available > in Cython, not that it should be automatically be used by some heuristic. >
Yes, exactly. And I definitely agree that it should be very explicit. William _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
