Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > Stefan Behnel wrote: > >> Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> >> >>> Unfortunately the devel branch is even less stable than usual, as >>> temporary variable handling is undergoing a major shift >>> >>> >> "less stable" is a clear understatement. I actually consider it broken in >> a couple of places. A lot of code will still work, but crashes (both >> compiler crashes and runtime crashes) should be expected. >> >> > The only changes that's been done should be backwards-compatible with > the old temp system though. So if you feel that this is the wrong time > for fixing up those things and that it halts other kinds of development, > you "should" be able to simply change the nodes back to ExprNode and > have everything go back to a relatively normal, stable state. Except > your dict optimizations, but those can be disabled easily. (I suppose > BoolBinopNode might be an exception to this BTW, but that's localized to > one place.) > TupleNode.generate_assignment_code is another possible exception to this.
Dag Sverre _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
